Supreme Court Rebukes Telangana CM Revanth Reddy for Comments on K Kavitha’s Bail
Image Source: ABP News
The Supreme Court unequivocally criticized Telangana Chief Minister Revanth Reddy for his comments on the law, especially with respect to the bail granted to BRS leader K Kavitha in the Delhi excise policy case. Reddy had questioned the speed with which Kavitha secured bail, suggesting that it raised suspicions of political interference. He compared the situation to that of Delhi Deputy Chief Minister Manish Sisodia, who had to wait 15 months for bail in a similar case, and Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal, who is still waiting.
Reddy’s comments, which implied that Kavitha might have received special treatment due to possible behind-the-scenes support from the BJP, drew the attention of a Supreme Court bench. The bench, led by Justice BR Gavai and including Justices KV Viswanathan and Prashant Kumar Mishra, expressed strong disapproval. Justice Gavai questioned whether Reddy had read his own statements, pointing out the inappropriateness of such comments from a Chief Minister.
Supreme Court’s Response
During the hearing, the Supreme Court emphasized that its decisions are not influenced by political considerations and that the judiciary operates independently. Justice Gavai addressed the notion of courts needing to consult political parties before passing orders. He also stated that while criticism of judgments is acceptable, the judiciary will continue to perform its duties impartially.
The court also expressed concern over the potential impact of political figures on legal proceedings. Justice Viswanathan highlighted the importance of maintaining mutual respect between institutions and keeping a proper distance between the judiciary and the executive.
The Supreme Court was hearing a request to transfer the trial of the 2015 cash-for-votes scam, in which Revanth Reddy is accused, from Telangana to Bhopal. The court said that the transfer was not off the table and adjourned the case to September 2.
Earlier, the Supreme Court indicated that it might appoint a special public prosecutor to conduct the trial against Reddy, who is both the accused and the Home Minister of Telangana. This move followed concerns raised by the petitioners about ensuring a fair trial, given Reddy’s influential position.
The cash-for-votes case dates back to May 31, 2015, when Reddy, then a member of the Telugu Desam Party (TDP), was allegedly caught offering a bribe of Rs 50 lakh to Elvis Stephenson, a nominated MLA, in exchange for support in the legislative council elections. This incident has since become a significant legal and political controversy in Telangana.
Team Profile
- News Writer
- Sanchita is currently pursuing her master's in journalism and mass communication. She has already completed a PG diploma in journalism and mass communication from Patna Women's College and her graduation from Berhampur University. With a strong desire to become a journalist, she is focused on learning and enhancing her skills to excel in her chosen career.
Latest entries
English10 September 2024AAP-Congress Union Talks for Haryana Decisions Fall Flat Over Seat Sharing
English9 September 2024Jawhar Sircar Leaves from Rajya Sabha in the Midst of Debasement and Misusing Allegations
Defence8 September 2024Pakistan Army Admits Role in Kargil War for the First Time
English7 September 2024AAP-Congress Organization Together Faces Seat-Sharing Debate in Haryana Elections
